Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
152-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

152-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.005221 50.852719)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.005164 50.852713,-1.005167 50.852724,-1.005175 50.852734,-1.005187 50.852742,-1.005203 50.852748,-1.005220 50.852749,-1.005238 50.852748,-1.005254 50.852743,-1.005267 50.852735,-1.005275 50.852725,-1.005278 50.852714,-1.005275 50.852703,-1.005268 50.852693,-1.005255 50.852685,-1.005239 50.852679,-1.005222 50.852678,-1.005204 50.852679,-1.005188 50.852684,-1.005176 50.852692,-1.005167 50.852702,-1.005164 50.852713)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL